Share:


Modeling and simulation for supply chain finance under uncertain environment

    Wei Jin   Affiliation
    ; Chengfu Wang   Affiliation

Abstract

This paper studies the role of factoring in a bilateral supply chain, where both the supplier and retailer are financially constrained. Applying the stylized Stackelberg game, we analytically present that the supplier’s capital shortage limits the advantage of trade credit provided to the retailer. To overcome this limitation, we design a hybrid strategy composing of trade credit and factoring, and then investigate how the supplier uses factoring strategy to achieve the best performance. Analytical and numerical results show that: (1) each supply chain partner can benefit from factoring, and the benefits depend on operational and financial characteristics; (2) in a fairly priced factoring market, bankruptcy costs reduce the benefits of factoring, but does not change the dominance of full factoring; (3) in a strategically priced factoring market, partial factoring may dominate full factoring. Managerially, our study implies that a supplier may benefit from dividing his accounts receivable when facing a factor with a strong pricing ability.


First published online 28 February 2020

Keyword : operations research, strategy, decision making, game theory

How to Cite
Jin, W. ., & Wang, C. . (2020). Modeling and simulation for supply chain finance under uncertain environment. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26(4), 725-750. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.12054
Published in Issue
Jun 12, 2020
Abstract Views
1606
PDF Downloads
898
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Buzacott, J. A., & Zhang, R. Q. (2004). Inventory management with asset-based financing. Management Science, 50(9), 1274–1292. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0278

Chen, Z., & Zhang, R. (2019). A cash‐constrained dynamic lot‐sizing problem with loss of goodwill and credit‐based loan. International Transactions in Operational Research, 00(2019), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12675

Chod, J. (2016). Inventory, risk shifting, and trade credit. Management Science, 63(10), 3207–3225. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2515

Chod, J., Lyandres, E., & Yang, S. A. (2019). Trade credit and supplier competition. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(2), 484–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.008

Dada, M., & Hu, Q. (2008). Financing newsvendor inventory. Operations Research Letters, 36(5), 569– 573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2008.06.004

Do, T. M. H. (2018). Factoring as a form of financing small and medium-sized enterprises in ASEAN. Applied Economics and Finance, 5(3), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.11114/aef.v5i3.3175

Giannetti, M., Burkart, M., & Ellingsen, T. (2011). What you sell is what you lend? Explaining trade credit contracts. The Review of Financial Studies, 24(4), 1261–1298. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn096

Gong, X., Chao, X., & Simchi‐Levi, D. (2014). Dynamic inventory control with limited capital and short-term financing. Naval Research Logistics, 61(3), 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21576

Huang, J., Yang, W., & Tu, Y. (2019). Supplier credit guarantee loan in supply chain with financial constraint and bargaining. International Journal of Production Research, 57(22), 7158–7173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1581386

Jin, W., Zhang, Q., & Luo, J. (2018). Non-collaborative and collaborative financing in a bilateral supply chain with capital constraints. Omega, 88, 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.04.001

Kiisel, T. (2013). Factoring. In Getting a business loan (pp. 93–99). Apress, Berkeley, CA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-4999-3_9

Klapper, L. (2006). The role of factoring for financing small and medium enterprises. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(11), 3111–3130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.05.001

Kouvelis, P., & Zhao, W. (2011). The newsvendor problem and price-only contract when bankruptcy costs exist. Production and Operations Management, 20(6), 921–936. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2010.01211.x

Kouvelis, P., & Zhao, W. (2012). Financing the newsvendor: Supplier vs. bank, and the structure of optimal trade credit contracts. Operations Research, 60(3), 566–580. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1120.1040

Kouvelis, P., & Zhao, W. (2018). Who should finance the supply chain? Impact of credit ratings on supply chain decisions. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 20(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2017.0669

Lariviere, M. A., & Porteus, E. L. (2001). Selling to the newsvendor: An analysis of price-only contracts. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 3(4), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.3.4.293.9971

Li, H., Mai, L., Zhang, W., & Tian, X. (2019). Optimizing the credit term decisions in supply chain finance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 25(2), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2018.07.006

Li, Y., & Gu, C. (2018). Factoring policy with constant demand and limited capital. International Transactions in Operational Research, 00(2018), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12514

Lin, Q., & Xiao, Y. (2018). Retailer credit guarantee in a supply chain with capital constraint under push & pull contract. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 125, 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.08.029

Lu, Q., Gu, J., & Huang, J. (2019). Supply chain finance with partial credit guarantee provided by a third-party or a supplier. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 440–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.06.026

Mian, S. L., & Smith, C. W. (1992). Accounts receivable management policy: Theory and evidence. The Journal of Finance, 47(1), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb03982.x

Montibeller, G., Belton, V., & Lima, M. V. A. (2007). Supporting factoring transactions in Brazil using reasoning maps: A language-based DSS for evaluating accounts receivable. Decision Support Systems, 42(4), 2085–2092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2004.11.011

Peura, H., Yang, S. A., & Lai, G. (2017). Trade credit in competition: A horizontal benefit. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 19(2), 263–289. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2016.0608

Seifert, D., Seifert, R. W., & Protopappa-Sieke, M. (2013). A review of trade credit literature: Opportunities for research in operations. European Journal of Operational Research, 231(2), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.03.016

Sopranzetti, B. J. (1998). The economics of factoring accounts receivable. Journal of Economics and Business, 50(4), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-6195(98)00008-3

Soufani, K. (2002). On the determinants of factoring as a financing choice: Evidence from the UK[J]. Journal of Economics and Business, 54(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-6195(01)00064-9

Wang, C., Fan, X., & Yin, Z. (2019). Financing online retailers: Bank vs. electronic business platform, equilibrium, and coordinating strategy. European Journal of Operational Research, 276(1), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.009

Yang, S. A., & Birge, J. R. (2017). Trade credit, risk sharing, and inventory financing portfolios. Management Science, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2746645

Zha, Y., Chen, K., Yue, X., Yu, Y., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2019). Trade credit contract in the presence of retailer investment opportunity. Naval Research Logistics, 66,(4), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21840

Zhan, J., Chen, X., & Hu, Q. (2019). The value of trade credit with rebate contract in a capital-constrained supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 57(2), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1442946

Zhou, Y. W., Wen, Z. L., & Wu, X. (2015). A single-period inventory and payment model with partial trade credit. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 90, 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.08.003